Factual background and majority opinion Shaw v. Reno
north carolina s congressional districts (1993–1998); 12th district in pink.
the case involved redistricting of north carolina after 1990 census. north carolina submitted department of justice map 1 majority-minority black district—that is, district black majority. department of justice believed state have drawn such majority-minority district in order improve representation of black voters rather including them within 1 district. state revised map , submitted new plan, 1 2 majority-minority districts. proposed 12th district 160 miles (260 km) long, winding through state connect various areas having in common large black population. federal district court dismissed lawsuit north carolina voters on grounds had no claim relief under standard set previous supreme court case, united jewish organizations of williamsburgh v. carey.
justice sandra day o connor delivered opinion of court, reversed of district court. described shape of new district bizarre , said such district bears uncomfortable resemblance political apartheid. court found if redistricting map bizarre on face unexplainable on grounds other race , claim relief under fourteenth amendment united states constitution available plaintiffs. such redistricting held unconstitutional if found intended segregate voters race , segregation cannot justified under standard of strict scrutiny. actions subject standard must satisfy 3 conditions: compelling government interest, narrowly tailored achieve goal, , least restrictive means achieving interest.
Comments
Post a Comment