Security through obscurity Kerckhoffs's principle
it moderately common companies, , standards bodies in case of css encryption on dvds, keep inner workings of system secret. argue security obscurity makes product safer , less vulnerable attack. counter argument keeping innards secret may improve security in short term, in long run systems have been published , analyzed should trusted.
steve bellovin commented:
the subject of security through obscurity comes frequently. think lot of debate happens because people misunderstand issue.
it helps, think, go kerckhoffs s second principle, translated system must not require secrecy , can stolen enemy without causing trouble, per http://petitcolas.net/fabien/kerckhoffs/. kerckhoffs said neither publish nor keep secret ; rather, said system should still secure if enemy has copy.
in other words – design system assuming opponents know in detail. (a former official @ nsa s national computer security center told me standard assumption there serial number 1 of new device delivered kremlin.) after that, though, there s nothing wrong trying keep secret – s hurdle factor enemy has overcome. (one obstacle british ran when attacking german enigma system simple: didn t know unkeyed mapping between keyboard keys , input rotor array.) – don t rely on secrecy.
Comments
Post a Comment